Projo Subterranean Homepage NewsBottom-up journalism from the pros: News, tech and culture by Sheila Lennon |
|
« Another 'Who killed JFK?' answer; War on Terror diminishes us; Onion to launch video channel |
Main
| Transcript: Couric with the Edwardses; Harleys for mangoes; Bill Maher rant video »
Kathy Gill, author of the U.S. Politics: Current Events blog at NYT-owned About.com, takes on a story that may be too geeky for for both print media and the soundbite culture: GWB43.com, AttorneyGate and Federal Records Requirements. Here's how it starts: Last week, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics (CREW) asked Congress to investigate White House staff use of "gwb43.com" e-mail addresses while conducting official government business. (tip) The domain name is owned by the Republican National Committee (see a screenshot of whois registry info) and was probably created as a means for staffers to have e-mail conversations about the 2004 election while at work (bypassing the prohibited White House mail servers). Here's a shot of one of those emails, at Washington Monthly, which ends with "Dammit, it was sent to Susan on her rnc pager and was not supposed to go into the WH system." (Susan B. Ralston...Special Assistant to the President & Assistant to the Senior Advisor Karl Rove, resigned October 6, 2006, "after disclosures that she accepted gifts from and passed information to now-convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff... -- Sourcewatch) Hugely popular and partisan Democratic blog Daily Kos is all over this gwb43.com story. AP mentioned gwb43.com briefly in this March 13 story: Gonzales Rejects Calls for Resignation And in one on March 24, cited, with comments, from Republican site FreeRepublic.com. Stay tuned... Related: Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo, credited with bringing this story to national attention, answering those "who seem to be asking, genuinely, what the big deal is": ...there appears to have been a whole process in place to root out prosecutors who wouldn't prostitute their offices for partisan goals. Indeed, what sort of permanent advantage would go to the party in the White House if they were to install only federal prosecutors who would agree to prosecute potential candidates of the opposing party? 1 CommentsLeave a comment |
|
|
|
Clearly this is how they have done business for some time. Here's a random call for nominees to Federal jobs from Scott Jennings a couple of years ago. This is White House Business, and he uses his WH title, but note the email address:
"Friday, May 13, 2005
Presidential Boards and Commissions Looking for Nominations from Kentuckians
*Scott Jennings, a hard working fellow Kentucky Republican, that is now working in the White House is circulating this list of Presidential Boards and Commissions openings looking for suggestions of any possible nominees from Kentucky.
We are looking for some qualified people to serve on a few Bush Administration Boards and Commissions. Take a look at the list, and if you have anyone please forward a resume—
*National Council on Disabilities – 4 Vacancies
*President’s Council on Physical Fitness – 12 vacancies
*Advisory Council on Historic Preservation – 1 vacancy; someone who is a superstar in the area of historic preservation
J. Scott Jennings
Associate Director
White House Office of Political Affairs
sjennings@gwb43.com
Office: 202-456-5275
posted by Kentucky Republican Voice at 9:13 AM 0 comments"
Report Abuse