Projo Subterranean Homepage News

Bottom-up journalism from the pros: News, tech and culture by Sheila Lennon

CNN's audience reaction meter nearly won last night's debate

8:59 AM Wed, Oct 08, 2008 |
By Sheila Lennon    Email this author |   Email this entry

mccain100708.jpg


obama100708.jpg


In last night's presidential debate, the CNN reaction meter at the bottom of the screen was more interesting than the debate itself, but that's not saying much.

These lines were pretty flat for long stretches for both candidates, longer for Republican John McCain. His closing speech did better than this literal screenshot, his attacks fared worse. Democrat Barack Obama hit this peak more often than McCain. Women seemed more positive than men about both candidates. Men flatlined when McCain talked about victory in Iraq, peaked when Obama talked about the $10 billion-a-month cost of the war being needed at home.

Imagine if we all had this interactive TV widget, a dial spanning 1-100 with which you could silently cheer or boo every nuance, mood, policy or worn talking point.

What sticks this morning is McCain dismissively calling Obama "That one" and us "my friends" 25 22 times. It's fusty old insincerity. Obama's "brain cramps" -- moments when he seemed to lose his train of thought -- were disconcerting. Early on, he said the computer was invented by government scientists to communicate -- that was the Internet -- but he didn't fix it.

Obama didn't sketch a New Deal -- McCain did, freaking out his conservative base right out of the box with his new plan to spend $300 billion more dollars to bail out bad mortgages.

shirt_front.jpg

They were both pretty flat, McCain looked pale, puffy and tired; when Obama put some energy behind his words, the audience meter seemed to rise, too. When he talked about his mother dying of cancer while fighting the insurance company for treatment, he struck a strong chord.

That's what these screenshots caught. I only took a few frames during a span of a minute -- this is a tiny timeslice.The double exposure of McCain is a moment in time I couldn't have caught if I tried.

We grew weary, and were glad when it ended.


Roundup: Back to Their Corners, The NYT Opinionator blog.

Bookmark and Share

8 Comments

Campbell said:

Sure it would have been a change of pace if McCain stood up at the end and asked the American people:

"Do you want to live in a socialist fascist state controlled by a dictator whose political career began in the living room of a domestic terrorist."

People were looking for blood last night and I can understand that. But in reality as the media did their number to set up Palin to fail in her debate the media was attempting to set up McCain as well. Obama did not say anything different. In fact Obama was more boring than McCain. You can only stretch "style" so far.



Louis Carbone said:

Why wait? The Republicans are imposing socialism on us right now with this bailout, and McCain's housing bailout.

Nobody needs to set Palin up. She and only she controls what comes out of her mouth, and it's usualy appalling and incoherent.

I think Obama is boring, too. But I think he'll change things. They need changing. McCain looks like he's going to need a long rest after this campaign not a new job.



Brendan Farmer said:

Actually, Obama was correct about the computer. He said that it was created by government scientists to encrypt and decrypt military communications, which is accurate. Maybe factcheck?



Brendan, here's the transcript of that section:

Obama: ..."It (a new energy economy) can be an engine that drives us into the future the same way the computer was the engine for economic growth over the last couple of decades.

And we can do it, but we're going to have to make an investment. The same way the computer was originally invented by a bunch of government scientists who were trying to figure out, for defense purposes, how to communicate, we've got to understand that this is a national security issue, as well."

Colossus, that cracked the Enigma codes, was developed by the British in the early '40s. It was a very fast calculator. I don't think Obama was really talking about that.

The Internet was about communication among researchers working on defense contracts. I had a summer job during college as a vacation replacement for secretaries in the physics dept. at Brown in '66 and '67, when Arpanet, the packet switching network that preceded the Internet, was being developed. I typed lots of grant proposals and correspondence about it and about defense contracts funding the high-energy research going on there.

Ted Nelson of Brown had coined the term hypertext in '65, and Andy Van Dam made the first operational hypertext system there in '67.

Forrest Gump-like, as a teenager I had a lowly seat in that environment, and watched some of it developing.



Jerry Gaddis said:

I am so sick of both parties! Neither are worthy to be prseident! To see the coverage of all the networks makes me not to even want to vote. Too much bias in the media!



Sean Piper said:

Simply put, things haven't worked out so well these past 8 years...
let's try something new.

Period.



Arwen said:

Well said, Sean.



Jim said:

Jerry, Sean & Arwen: Let's send Obama & McCain a message. We need to vote for a 3rd-party candidate who will break the stranglehold the Dems and the GOP have had the country in for decades .




Leave a comment





Type the characters you see in the picture above.