Projo Subterranean Homepage NewsBottom-up journalism from the pros: News, tech and culture by Sheila Lennon |
|
« Coast Guard video: 1 rescued, 3 missing in Fla. waters, including 2 NFL players |
Main
| Flower (slide)show; Early Stones, Beatles photos found; new Neko Case; Fine-raising at Patrick's »
Vin Crosbie's latest MRI of news orgs on Feb. 20, Wasting Ink, Beating a Dead Horse, hosts an interesting conversation about newspapers, news orgs' Web sites and revenue in comments that deserves a wider airing. But since then, he notes on Twitter: Herd Instinct: Newsday's decision 2charge online may start causing dinosaur migration towards that cliff. Hearst next? http://bit.ly/sxYVW (How will advertisers feel about barring the door to their messages?) Vin decided to fantasize ideas that are even worse, and invites other gallows humorists to join in: Holding contest 2devise stupidest biz model 2suggest 2 panicky Rip Van Winkles of print n/paper companies: #printieplan about 24 hours ago... Vin Crosbie See entries from fellow Twitterers who put #printieplan in their tweets, as assembled at hashtags/tag/printieplan. Or, even easier, check out this Twitter search for #printieplan. The latest from Vin as I type this: Charge newspaper printed edition readers micropayments per page. Hope Walt Isaacson and Alan Mutter approve! #printieplan
vincrosbie: Allow only owners of ;CueCat scanners to access newspaper Web sites for free. #printieplan To enter your idea, sign up at Twitter and check out Kristen Worth's hashtag primer. Sample: ...in order to get tracked via a hash tag, you need to opt-in and follow http://twitter.com/hashtags. Use #printieplan to get your idea into the meme. If this is all too much, leave your idea in comments. I'll get the best of them in there for you. I have an idea I could enter, but Isaacson might like it too much: Make obits free, write as long as you like, put in pictures, video, audio, fond memories -- but charge people to read them. Ouch. I've touched on this earlier: Micropayments: Nickel-and-diming the news but, for what it's worth, I think putting up a pay wall while people are economizing is a terrible idea: even Doc Searls is trying to save money by dropping his TV feed. How many news stories are you willing to pay to read for a few minutes at how many different sites? And how am I going to link to them, not knowing who subscribes to what? And what would I pay to subscribe to? What would be left? An informed society that comprises only those who can afford to buy the news leaves behind a much larger failed society. Related: The micropayments argument: do we want to turn the web into Zimbabwe? in the Guardian. More about Twitter last night from Jon Stewart and Samantha Bee:
Jon Stewart and Samantha Bee Discuss Twitter at the | Comedy Central Insider Blog. How come the middle-aged talking heads in the mainstream media will never cop to being late to a trend? While they're going on and on about Twitter, we young people have already moved on to writing messages on mini-chalkboards and sending them to our friends via bike messenger.
Twitter lurkers read between the lines about A's frustration with his wife, who Ms. H is exchanging massages with, and notice who only points to blog posts and tweets that mention him. One thing you can't hide 2 CommentsLeave a comment |
|
|
|
The Christian Science Monitor has a donate feature. I think that's a good idea. I respect them for their lack of bias, and there aren't many newspapers I can say that about, and intense coverage of environmental issues.
I dumped cox's tv feed a year or so ago. Almost everything is available on the web, and I've been annoyed with them every since I found out half my cable fee was going for ESPN, which I never watch.
Report Abuse
I should add, I also fork out for netflix now, that is a super way to have cheap access to a huge number of movies and new and old tv shows. And they normally have about a two day turnaround for return a DVD get a new one.
Report Abuse